How would you like it if I told you that you only needed to go into work three days a week? Almost all of you–given the chance–would take me up on that offer, right?
Now here’s the fine print: I said, “go into work” as opposed to “not work.” In other words, we’re not talking about only working three days a week, but instead working a full week but spending two of the five days at home or elsewhere.
The prior posts from the past two weeks have dealt with the concept of the remote office. I’ve argued that Citrix and other software have made it possible for us to have increased flexibility in the workplace. Attorneys fly around the country all the time for client meetings, depositions, and court hearings in other jurisdictions–and during this time, they manage to continue to log in to the firm server and work as though they were in the office. All these road warriors need are a cell phone, a laptop, Citrix, and Wi-Fi.
So why is it that most of us are stuck in the office five days a week, from Monday to Friday? Who came up with the idea that people have to commute to work five days a week out of every seven? Does it still make sense in our technologically advanced society?
I had lunch recently with a friend who is a brilliant lawyer. He’s a mid-level associate at a large law firm in the Bay Area, and he decided that there was absolutely no reason for him to physically be at work five days a week. He felt that he could actually be more efficient at home, where he could focus on his job without the distractions of the office. Plus, when he was at the office, he generally communicated with partners and other associates through calls and e-mail anyway, so what difference did it make for him to be physically present? It was a waste of commute time, a waste of gas, and it meant having to eat out instead of being able to fix himself a nice healthy lunch in his own kitchen.
Being somewhat of an independent thinker, he decided to simply not show up to work once in a while. It started as once every couple weeks, just on a trial basis. No one seemed to notice, so he increased it to once a week. No one complained, and so he started disappearing two days a week.
When partners needed to get a hold of him, his assistant would simply transfer the calls to his cell phone. During the work days when he worked from home, he was completely responsive to calls and e-mail. When he first started disappearing, the partners never even noticed. Only his assistant knew where he really was.
Of course, eventually, the partnership caught on to what he was doing. But, by that point, what could they say? He was produced high-quality work product in an efficient manner, and there was no justification for keeping him in the office. In fact, he could argue to the partners that eliminating his commute time actually increased his billable production, ultimately adding value to the firm’s bottom line.
As to days when he physically needed to be in the office for face to face meetings or when there was a project that would be easier to supervise from the office, on those days, he would show up. The key is that he didn’t attempt to completely eliminate going to the office; he simply reduced the time he spent there for moments when his physical presence was actually needed.
So if you’d like to commute to the office only three days a week, why not try it? Figure out opportunities when your physical presence is not needed, and stay home. You’ll be surprised just how empowering this can be, and how wonderful it feels. Just make sure you don’t end up turning on the TV and watching the NCAA tournament all day. If you don’t have the discipline to actually work from home, this is not for you.